Pembroke is one of the less outstanding colleges which make up the University of Oxford by reputation; however, this is most undeserved. Admittedly, it has some amazing teaching and welfare staff, and a far nicer crop of students than the usual Oxford cohort of home-county privately educated mishaps. Under this seemingly tranquil surface, huge cracks aren’t too hard to find. As with most central university administrations, Pembroke’s management team don’t care about the welfare of staff or students. They are more bothered with conference profits, alumni donations from dodgy regimes, and renaming buildings to fund the latest unnecessary innovation. There are not enough cheap rooms for students whose families can’t afford to go on holidays and not too long ago Pembroke’s management tried to knock down most of the remaining cheapest rooms made available for students. This point is made again and again by the student body and yet management refuses to act. To add insult to injury, Pembroke’s much talked about Access programme is wholly inadequate. The scheme does some good work yet is limited in scope. It goes no where near to addressing massive structural problems in the wider education system. The college still spends its own, and students’ resources, showing private school pupils around at the expense of those who don’t already have a structural advantage in society. Pembroke also give large scholarships of £1000 a year to those who get the best first-year results. The correlation between those who get the best first year results and those who went to private schools (and therefore don’t need an extra £1000 off accommodation costs p/a) is worryingly high. This money could be far better spent helping poorer students who need it. This is to say nothing of the link College is making between financial rewards and academic achievement. Perhaps the most outstanding contribution Pembroke management has made to the education sector in the last few years is its shameful role in bringing about the largest strike in higher education history by having no regard for the welfare of its staff in retirement. Management manoeuvred to stifle democratic votes in college on the USS pension reforms and collaborated with the ‘money-above-all-else’ central university team of Louise Richardson to push for reforms which undervalue the hard work of pension participants. Putting student results ahead of their welfare isn’t something unique to Pembroke, or even Oxford, but shows how complicit in maintaining an exploitative, repressive educational status-quo Pembroke management are. Marketisation of education and educational facilities is the name of the game. In short, the culture in the management of Pembroke College is rotten to the core and this adversely impacts on students and staff. It’s a shame the college isn’t stand-alone in this regard throughout the rest of Oxford University.