Mitchells Solicitors york

I've been dealing with the Mitchells Solicitors over the last 20 months in regards to Inheritance dispute, and then a house sale. Both Philip Chapman and Celia Earley were absolutely brilliant throughout, providing me with a constant support, and gaining a great result in the end. I'm really happy I've used their services. True professionals. Alex K.

I was recommended to Celia Earley when purchasing my house. Informative, attentive and conscientious Celia ensured I understood where we were throughout the process. I could not be happier with the service.

Celia Earley always very communicative and gets the job done

Never again. Longest house sale and buy ever. Amateurs.

Couldn’t be unhappier. If we ever move again we’ll use a different soliciter for sure.

I changed form L. Solicitors after 3 moths not get me to anywhere to Celia at Mitchells solicitor for help to buy my new home at Number 28 R. St. It is very quick and fixed price the same as the other. I Strong recommend . Thank you

Not good at all, o don’t recommend at all, a lot of time wasting and lack of communication

I've just used Mitchells to help with a house purchase. I found Celia Earley to be efficient, responsive and extremely helpful throughout the transaction.

I called asking if they would witness a Statutory Decleration, woman who answered phone sounded like she'd just woken up, said no they couldn't do it and just hung up. Avoid

Incompetence at the highest level! Nigel Harbinson and others unhappy at losing thousands - look at SRA compaint asap! Contact Solicitor's Disciplinary Tribunal to find out about Mr Chapman's misconduct in 2010. He was made to pay about £22000 total in fines/compensation for similar. 1. Whilst acting under a Registered Power of Attorney the Respondent provided a service to his client that was so poor as to amount to professional misconduct, in breach of Practice Rule 1 of the Solicitors Practice Rules 1990 (“the SPR”); 2. Whilst acting as Co-Executor of the Estate of the same client the Respondent provided a service so poor as to amount to misconduct in breach of Rule 1 of the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007 (“the SCC”) in that he failed to deal timeously or at all with a complaint raised by his Co-Executor; and 3. The Respondent failed to comply with the duty to co-operate with the Legal Complaints Service in breach of Rule 20.05 of the SCC I hope this helps.